Is MDA removing red Star of David from its Judea & Samaria ambulances under ICRC pressure?

This story has crept by under the radar, but it was brought to my attention just yesterday by Zvi who lives in the Shomron.  He heard about it from arguments in their local town council about funding of various community services including ambulances.

Magen David Adom Ambulance

Magen David Adom Ambulance

The prime Israeli ambulance service is Magen David Adom (“MDA” , lit: Red Star of David) and it is funded mainly by private donations and “friends” organizations all over the world.  For decades MDA was barred from joining the International Red Cross organization for all sorts of obscure reasons, one of the prime ones of which was “the proliferation of too many symbols” in the organization. This did not explain the acceptance of the Red Crescent organization in Muslim countries or Red Lion organizations in Asian regions. It was widely felt that MDA’s rejection was a cover for antisemitism.

Magen David in Red Crystal

The new MDA internation symbol: Magen David in Red Crystal

In 2006, MDA was finally admitted to the ICRC:

In her March 2000 letter to the International Herald Tribune, Dr. Bernadine Healy, then president of the American Red Cross, wrote: “The international committee’s feared proliferation of symbols is a pitiful fig leaf, used for decades as the reason for excluding the Magen David Adom — the Shield (or Star) of David.” In protest, the American Red Cross withheld millions in administrative funding to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies(IFRC) since May 2000.

Since the mid-1990s, there has also been extensive and growing co-operation between MDA and the ICRC including, among other things, a $2.2 million expenditure on strengthening ties between the two organisations, the signing in 2000 of a two year co-operation statement, the permanent placement of an ICRC co-operation officer in MDA headquarters, and extensive support of the MDA’s blood bank activities. In addition, there are bilateral cooperation agreements between MDA and a number of national Red Cross societies.

On December 7, 2005, a diplomatic conference of states party to the Geneva Conventions adopted a third additional protocol, thereby introducing a new protective emblem, dubbed the “Red Crystal.” This “third protocol emblem” is hailed as a truly universal emblem free of religious, ethnic, or political connotation. The new symbol is a red square frame tilted at a 45 degree angle. According to the rules of the third additional protocol, MDA can continue to use the Red Star of David as its sole emblem for indicative purposes within Israel. For indicative use in abroad missions, MDA can, depending on the specific situation in the host country, either incorporate the Red Star of David inside the Red Crystal or use the Red Crystal alone.

On June 22, 2006, MDA was recognised by the ICRC and admitted as a full member of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent societies,[5] following adoption of the Red Crystal symbol in the statutes of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement on the same level as the Red Cross and Red Crescent symbols.[6]

Yonatan Yagodovsky, director of MDA’s fundraising department, said in an article published in October 2011 regarding the use of their logo in the West Bank that “MDA will continue to use its emblem and logo, and no one ever asked us to take it off.[7]

The footnote at the end of the highlighted sentence above takes us to an article in the Canadian Jewish Tribune which rather contradicts Yagodovsky’s words:

The controversy over the alleged removal of the familiar red Star of David logo representing the Magen David Adom (MDA) first aid organization from ambulances operating in Judea and Samaria apparently has not been resolved.  Not for the first time, the issue came to the fore this past summer when Israeli media reported that the traditional MDA logo on ambulances in Judea and Samaria had been replaced by a white, six-pointed star in a red circle.

Yesha (Judea and Samaria) Council Chairman Dani Dayan accused Israel’s premiere emergency medical service of caving to political pressure, which MDA denied.

“It is quite clear that the reason is political,” Dayan asserted in a Jerusalem Post column at the time.
Approached by the Jewish Tribune for an update, Dayan said he was now trying to resolve the issue quietly rather than speaking with media.

Yonatan Yagodovsky, director of MDA’s fundraising department, told the Tribune in a telephone interview: “I don’t know what there is to resolve…. MDA will continue to use its emblem and logo, and no one ever asked us to take it off – not now, not in 2006 when we were accepted to the International Red Cross and not before that.”

Yagodovsky then tries to wriggle out of the removal of the Magen David symbol:

“MDA operates ambulances in our stations throughout the country, including Judea and Samaria,” Yagodovsky stated. “All the ambulances operating from MDA stations carry the MDA logo without any change. In general, there are ambulances that are close to the end of the service; we call them senior ambulances. They’ve been in service five or six years and they operate inside and outside the Green Line…. Since these ambulances are operated by councils and team members of the councils, they are not MDA ambulances. Therefore, we have decided to mark them in a different way.”

This claim however is completely discounted by an MDA volunteer:

One Yesha resident with connections to MDA, who asked to remain anonymous, challenged the notion that the so-called senior ambulances are not MDA property, claiming that they’re operated by MDA volunteers and the gas and expenses are paid for by MDA. In fact, MDA is listed on the ownership papers, he said.

MDA ambulance with new symbol

MDA ambulance with new symbol, not the Red Magen David

Arutz Sheva expands on this controversy:

The Magen David Adom first response organization is removing its trademark red Star of David symbol from ambulances used in Israeli towns east of the 1949 armistice line, community leaders in Judea and Samaria have reported. The move is apparently part of an agreement with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which has previously taken exception to use of the Star.

Moves to recognize the armistice line as having special meaning are controversial in Israel. They are often seen as siding with the Palestinian Authority, which insists on treating the line — also referred to as the pre-1967 line — as a border even though it has no legal significance.

Judea and Samaria community leaders accused MDA of using subterfuge to make the switch. Ambulances that were sent for repairs were returned with the new symbols, they said.

MDA admits to changing the symbols on many ambulances, but denies that the change is connected to towns’ location on either side of the armistice line.

“MDA operates two types of ambulances. One is operated from MDA stations, while the other includes community ambulances, present in villages, kibbutzim, moshavim… The communities operate the ambulances independently, pay the workers’ salaries and are responsible for repairs,” the organization said in a statement.

“MDA decided to change the writing on the community ambulances so that it would be clear which community they are located in, and which community operated them,” the statement continued.

The group denied rumors that MDA had agreed not to operate east of the armistice line.

However, Judea and Samaria leaders remained suspicious of the true motives behind the change. An appeal to MDA was met with a statement saying, in part, that the move to change the symbols had been made “in coordination with the Foreign Ministry” – a clear indicator, leaders said, that the move was in fact political.

Judea and Samaria (Yesha) Council members were not appeased by MDA’s assurances that “community ambulances” west of the armistice line would eventually have the same symbol change. The “community ambulances” in question are used in Arab villages whose residents do not care for the regular Star of David symbol, they argued.

However the Jerusalem Post in its own write-up brings the MDA leadership’s denial of any policy to change the famous Red Star of David symbol:

Magen David Adom defended itself Tuesday against accusations by settlers that it had politicized medical service by removing its classic logo of the Red Star of David from ambulances servicing Israelis living in Judea and Samaria.

The Council of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip made this charge after the logo on the ambulance servicing the Kiryat Arba settlement was switched to the outline of a white six-pointed star in a red circle. Inside the star is the international medical symbol.

Council head Dani Dayan charged that MDA had caved to a demand by the International Committee of the Red Cross in a 2005 agreement not to use the Red Star logo in regions beyond the pre-1967 border.

MDA spokesman Zaki Heller rejected Dayan’s claims.

He said that in order to join the ICRC Israel had agreed in 2005 not to use its classic logo when operating outside of Israel. Instead, MDA agreed to place the star inside a red diamond.

But, Heller said, MDA continues to use the classic Red Star logo on its ambulances housed in 12 places across the West Bank.

What did occur, in a nod to the ICRC, is that MDA decided not to place its classic Red Star of David logo on ambulances that were owned by individual communities and only jointly operated with MDA, Heller said.

To ensure that this was not viewed as a political statement regarding Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank, said Heller, MDA decided to changes the logos on all such ambulances across the country.

So who is right and where does the truth rest? We shall find out as ambulances are refurbished, repaired and acquired.

This matter goes beyond a question of a mere symbol on an ambulance, something that ordinarily would be considered a minor issue of design. The acceptance or rejection of the Red Magen David goes right to the heart of the acceptance of the State of Israel, with its Jewish character and symbols, into the community of nations. It also points to the steadfastness or otherwise of our leaders in the face of international pressure from foreign NGOs, organizations and governments.

This entry was posted in International relations, Israel news and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Is MDA removing red Star of David from its Judea & Samaria ambulances under ICRC pressure?

  1. Andrea says:

    Red Diamond or Crystal is ridicolous and it is suspicious that problem came up only with Star of David ( even out of Judea/Samaria – West Bank ) – definetely right.

    In my opinion Red Cross should have been the same all over the world from the beginning since – if I am not wrong- symbols are originated from Helvetic flag with inverted colours -with no specific reference to any religion ( if not dating back ages ). After all UK flag has several crosses but – I suppose – Muslims and Jews British citizens never asked to change it with “neutral” flag.

    No Red Magen David out of Israel ? I am a simple guy it seems – since people to be rescued is not discriminated by religion or nationality, I would accept a Red Magen on ambulance. I am sure that Palestinians have other problems to think about.

    • anneinpt says:

      You’re right, Andrea, that the Red Cross originated from the Swiss flag and had no relation to any religion. As for the Palestinians having other problems to think about – one would think so. It’s not clear if the pressure to change the Magen David symbol came from the Red Cross itself or from pressure via the Palestinians.

      • cba says:

        I’m going to quibble with the “no relation to any religion” bit. While the Red Cross symbol is indeed the Swiss flag with the colours inverted, the cross on the Swiss flag isn’t just some geometric symbol, it IS a religious symbol. And as for the Union Jack that Andrea mentions, that’s the superposition of the crosses of Saints George, Andrew, and Patrick–most DEFINITELY religious symbols.

  2. NormanF says:

    It is acquiescence to anti-Semitism. If the Red Cross, is a non-religious symbol, kindly explain for us why Muslim countries use a Red Crescent in its place? Its shameful the Magen David Adom is erasing the Red Magen David from its ambulances out of a misplaced desire to ingratiate themselves with the anti-Semites who run the International Committee Of The Red Cross. Jews must see to it the symbol remains intact throughout Israel and abroad, regardless of what the ICRC thinks. Belonging to this body is not worth the degradation of the Jewish people.

  3. reality says:

    its totally disgusting to capitulate to Red cross -I doubt any other country has -even those who”occupy” other parts of their own countries. & if Pals don’t want to go in our ambulances when they come to help so be it, let them suffer for the sake of a symbol. No one is being honest -its pure antisemitism. Slowly slowly its leaking into every small part of western society & us Israelis who always want to be accepted whatever, give in to every demand. Where & how will it end? the last time 6 million were killed this time its much more subtle but just as dangerous

  4. Andrea says:

    In my view crosses has lost its religious meaning in most of European flags – England, Sweden, Danemark and Norway since most of the population is not religious at all. it is an historical heritage, I concede, bout not more. Would it be the case to add Moon Crescent and Stars ?

  5. Pingback: Knesset to disscuss MDA commitment to cease operations in Judea & Samaria | Anne's Opinions

  6. Rob says:

    The International Red Cross is a deeply anti-Israeli organisation that arguably has some anti-Semitic intent at least within elements of the institution. Their bias in the Lebanon and Gaza wars was clear but going back a little further, they issued a quite rare condemnation when an ambulance driver was shot dead apparently trying to rescue the al-Dura’s in 2001 – yes that nortoriously faked Pallywood story! Further back still, they consistently refused to accept the Mogen David since Israel’s inception in 1948. Meanwhile they accepted the Red Crescent, and even a figurative lion for pre-Islamist Iran! Thus its unlikely to be a coincidence that the IRC was behind one of the key elements of anti-Israeli lawfare today, claiming (if I recall correctly) in the early 70’s that Israel acted against international law over settlements according to the Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, when in fact the related passage refers to the deportation and mass transfer of populations by an occupying power, rather than issues of voluntary settlement. This was a remarkable interpretation, especially when considering that the relevant passages of the British Mandate made it clear that close Jewish settlement on the relevant territories is legal.

    • anneinpt says:

      Rob, the Red Cross’s notorious history is well-known in Israel, which raises the question of why is Magen David Adom ceding to their biased demands? If it is a matter of funding I would think it preferable that MDA issue a call to its supporters worldwide to make up for any shortfall that they would lose if they refuse to kowtow to the Red Cross’s demands. It is outrageous that they are folding this way, and even worse that they are denying it even while there is evidence in front of our eyes with the new signs on the ambulances.

  7. Pingback: Delegitimization and demonization of Israel: From the UN to the EU to the Red Cross to Iceland and Brazil to an elementary school in Ithaca | Anne's Opinions

  8. Pingback: The Red Cross defends the Red Crescent’s neglect of Israeli murder victims | Anne's Opinions

Comments are closed.