US Chief of Staff visits Israel on confidence-building mission

US Chief of Staff Martin Dempsey with Israeli Chief of Staff Benny Gantz

US Chief of Staff Martin Dempsey with Israeli Chief of Staff Benny Gantz

If there is one phrase that makes me more uneasy than “we’re from the government and we are here to help you”, it is “we are from the United States Government and we are here to reassure you”.  I have no doubt that the US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey is sincere in his pronouncements; I am just rather wary of the Obama Administration’s motives in sending him to Israel at this specific time with this specific message, especially as it is no secret that the Americans would like Israel to hold off on attacking Iran.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff, began his round of meetings with Israel’s top military and political leadership on Friday with a clear message – coordination and dialogue is the key to improving Israel’s security standing in the region.

“We have many interests in common in the region in this very dynamic time and the more we can continue to engage each other, the better off we’ll all be,” Dempsey told IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz and Defense Minister Ehud Barak at the beginning of their meeting at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv on Friday. Barak responded saying, “There is never a dull moment. That I can promise you”.

Dempsey also assured Gantz of US commitment to Israel: “The simplest message of all, my presence here, I hope reflects the commitment we have with each other and I’m here to assure you that’s the case.”

“I do know that both our countries share the same interests and values, and I’m sure that we can somehow work it out together,” Gantz said to his US counterpart earlier in the conversation, seemingly referring to the issue of the Iranian nuclear threat.

Dempsey, the US’s most senior military officer, arrived in Israel late Thursday night for talks that are aimed at getting the IDF and the government to put the brakes on plans to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. The US is hoping that Israel will move attack plans to the back burner and give diplomacy and sanctions more time to have an effect on the Iranian regime.

The US army chief’s visit comes amid rising tension between Jerusalem and Washington over Israeli frustration with the US and Europe’s reluctance to impose tougher economic sanctions on Iran.

He is expected to try and reassure Israel that the Obama administration is committed to stopping Iran’s nuclear program, even if it ultimately comes down to using military force. Top US officials have recently said that the US will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon.

While there are differences between the countries as to the type of steps that need to be taken to stop Iran, both Israel and the US share the same intelligence assessments regarding the status of Iran’s nuclear program.

In related news, it appears that the huge joint US-Israel missile defense exercise, due to have taken place in the spring but whose postponement (not cancellation apparently) was announced earlier this week, was delayed at Israel’s request.

According to Jeffrey Goldberg:

Despite claims made in the Israeli press that the Obama Administration, worried about provoking Iran, initiated a postponement of a massive joint Israeli-U.S. missile defense exercise scheduled to begin later this month, Pentagon officials say it was the Israeli defense minister, Ehud Barak, who asked his counterpart, Leon Panetta, for the postponement. The claim that the exercise, dubbed “Austere Challenge 12,” was scrubbed from the calendar because the Obama Administration feared provoking the Iranian regime is “baseless,” one senior Pentagon official told me just a few minutes ago, in a telephone call initiated by a group of senior defense officials.

One of the senior defense officials told me this: “Minister Barak called Secretary Panetta and asked if we could take the exercise off the calendar. The Israelis were concerned that they did not have the resources in place to carry it out effectively.” The exercise, which was to begin with a live-fire drill, would have involved several thousand Israelis as well as several thousand American military personnel, and Barak told Panetta, according to these officials, that Israel could not pull together the resources necessary to stage the exercise successfully. “Our military is much bigger than theirs and this exercise was going to consume a much larger portion of their resources,” the official said.

Jeffrey Goldberg further reports that Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Oren confirmed this report.

These are definitely unsettling times. It would be proper to improve coordination of sensitive declarations like these to avoid giving a morale-boost to our enemies.

This entry was posted in International relations, Mideast news and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to US Chief of Staff visits Israel on confidence-building mission

  1. Brian Goldfarb says:

    I’m not sure that I share your view of the Obama’s administration’s reluctance re an Israeli strike against Iran. Sure, they’d prefer it not to happen, but only because they’d prefer Iran to stop trying to make nukes. Should it happen, even Obama (like all US President’s in this case) would wring their hands and berate Israel for launching an attack, but, if successful, they’d be (off-camera and off the record) jumping for joy.

    Why do you think there are all those reports of Israel taking delivery of large quantities of the new US bunker-busting bombs?

    • anneinpt says:

      I agree with your view that the Americans would prefer that Israel not attack Iran, but they wouldn’t be unhappy if Israel did in fact attack. On the other hand they’re certainly being very vocal about deterring Israel from such an attack.

      As for the bunker-busting bombs, I would be delighted if that were true. I’ve heard rumours that Israel is indeed taking delivery of them, but also that these deliveries have been delayed. Do you have a link? If it is true, then the US are obviously backing Israel, at least on the quiet. i just wonder at the wisdom of this softly-softly approach from the US. I think in the case of Iran, a big stick will work better. But that’s just my opinion…

  2. Brian Goldfarb says:

    Actually, I’d have to search long and hard, I’m afraid, Anne. It came, as I recall, from the UK Daily Telegraph, and I’ve certainly posted comments all over the place regarding this. I will try, though.

Comments are closed.