More Purim turnabouts: Arab reactions to Netanyahu’s speech

Purim has begun tonight here in Israel (Purim post coming up later), and in a similar manner to the upside-down “Venahafoch Hu” character of the day, reactions to Netanyahu’s speech to Congress were precisely the opposite of what one would expect.

In the West, Netanyahu and his speech were trashed more often than praised. For example the New York Times who called Netanyahu “unconvincing”; the Guardian called it “long on terror, short on substance”, and in general displayed their hysteria over the speech; the BBC broadcast through the Bowen filter; and that same Jeremy Bowen played the Holocaust card while accusing Bibi of same… the list goes on and I’m sure you can all find other egregious examples of BDS – Bibi Derangement Syndrome.

Strangely enough, or perhaps not so strangely, certain reactions in the Arab world were more positive.

Ahmad Al-Faraj (image: Al-Jazirah, Saudi Arabia)

MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) reports on a Saudi columnist who wrote that Netanyahu is right to insist on addressing Congress about the Iran deal:

In a March 2, 2015 article in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, columnist Dr. Ahmad Al-Faraj supported Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s decision to speak at the U.S. Congress against the upcoming deal with Iran. Al-Faraj said that Obama, “one of the worst American presidents,” is working to sign a deal with Iran at the expense of America’s longtime allies in the Gulf, and therefore Netanyahu’s campaign against the deal is justified and serves the interests of the Gulf states.

MEMRI then quote directly from Al-Faraj’s article:

“I will conclude by saying the following: Since Obama is the godfather of the prefabricated revolutions in the Arab world, and since he is the ally of political Islam, [which is] the caring mother of [all] the terrorist organizations, and since he is working to sign an agreement with Iran that will come at the expense of the U.S.’s longtime allies in the Gulf, I am very glad of Netanyahu’s firm stance and [his decision] to speak against the nuclear agreement at the American Congress despite the Obama administration’s anger and fury. I believe that Netanyahu’s conduct will serve our interests, the people of the Gulf, much more than the foolish behavior of one of the worst American presidents. Do you agree with me?”

The answer would most likely be a resounding “Yes”.

Al Arabiya in English too joined the onslaught on Obama, as the Algemeiner reports:

The powerful editor-in-chief of Al Arabiya English, Faisal J. Abbas, published a column on Tuesday in which he asked Obama to take notes from Netanyahu on the extent of the Iranian threat. In the piece, titled “President Obama, Listen to Netanyahu on Iran,” Abbas says, “one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran.”

In his remarks, Netanyahu “managed to accurately summarize a clear and present danger, not just to Israel (which obviously is his concern), but to other US allies in the region,” Abbas writes.

“What is absurd, however,” Abbas continues, “is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama, who is now infamous for being the latest pen-pal of the Supreme Leader of the World’s biggest terrorist regime: Ayottallah Ali Khamenei.”

Ouch!

What other Purim surprises might be in store for us?

This entry was posted in Media and journalism, Mideast news and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to More Purim turnabouts: Arab reactions to Netanyahu’s speech

  1. Daniel Grodzinski says:

    Which merely goes to prove the old adage: The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

    • anneinpt says:

      Not necessarily. At least not according to Bibi. Sometimes, as he said, the enemy of my enemy is also my enemy. עין ערך Iran and ISIS. But yeah, in general, you’re right. 🙂

  2. Reality says:

    I must say I’m flabbergasted that any Arab paper would even admit to agreeing to Netanyahu & trashing Obama.We sure live in strange times!!

  3. Brian Goldfarb says:

    In order to repeat myself, may I reference my comment to the article below this one, at no. 23? Some interesting comments in the links there (I think).

  4. Pingback: Is this the theory that explains Obama’s Mideast strategy? | Anne's Opinions

Comments are closed.