The unpretty story of Priti Patel

For a change of pace, the latest Israel-related scandal to hit British politics involves the Conservatives:  Priti Patel, a Conservative MP and Secretary of State for International Development, is in hot water for having had unscheduled meetings with Israeli politicians while she was on holiday in Israel. which, if any country other than Israel had been involved, is doubtful it would have escalated in the way it did.

Cabinet minister Priti Patel has apologised for failing to give neither Theresa May or Boris Johnson the heads-up about meeting Israel’s prime minister.

Priti Patel MP, Secretary of State for International Development

The International Development Secretary spent 12 days in the country on a family holiday in August, but also spent her time meeting top ministers, officials, businesses and charities.

When conducting official Government work overseas, ministers are supposed to tell the Foreign Office.

But Ms Patel has now admitted she gave no advance notice of her trip.

Downing Street has also revealed the Prime Minister was in the dark over Ms Patel’s meeting with Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu for more than two months, until last Friday.

Ms Patel’s actions have prompted calls for an investigation and even her resignation, with the senior Tory accused of breaching ministerial rules and misleading the British public.

On her return from the trip, Ms Patel ordered new work in her department on UK-Israeli partnerships.

On Monday, Ms Patel was also forced to clarify remarks she previously gave to the Guardian newspaper about the trip.

Her department admitted these may have formed the impression she had given Mr Johnson prior notice of her visit, and that those publically reported meetings were the only ones to have taken place.

Ms Patel also offered an apology and published a full list of her meetings, which were arranged by Tory peer Lord Polak, the honorary president of Conservative Friends of Israel.

She said: “This summer I travelled to Israel, on a family holiday paid for myself.

“While away I had the opportunity to meet a number of people and organisations. I am publishing a list of who I met.‎

“The Foreign and Commonwealth Office was aware of my visit while it was under way‎.

“In hindsight, I can see how my enthusiasm to engage in this way could be misread, and how meetings were set up and reported in a way which did not accord with the usual procedures.

“I am sorry for this and I apologise for it.”

What seems to have outraged Parliament and the media the most was the fact that Ms. Patel visited the Golan Heights – considered “occupied territory” (gasp!), despite the fact that the visit was in order to organize humanitarian aid for Syrian refugees via the IDF.

The criticism is set to increase Wednesday as Haaretz found that Patel visited an Israeli military field hospital set up by in the Golan Heights to treat Syrian refugees and victims of the civil war.

Like the rest of the international community, the British government does not recognize Israel’s control of the Golan Heights, captured for Syria in the Six-Day War in 1967.

The diplomatic protocol is that British ministers and senior officials do not travel in the Golan, as well as the West Bank and East Jerusalem, under the auspices of the Israeli government. Patel’s visit to the Israel Defense Forces field hospital in the Golan Heights as a guest of the Israeli government during her visit is a clear breach of protocol. Upon her return to London, Patel suggested that Britain help fund the field hospital’s operations.

This reaction shows that those who profess to love the Palestinians so much in fact do not care one hoot. They are quite willing to let the Palestinians or other Arabs suffer so long as Israel is harmed. In this case they would like to prevent funds from reaching Syrian refugees, one of the most needy and endangered groups in the world, simply because the funds would be channelled via the IDF, and would the aid would go through the Golan. If any of these smug virtue-signallers would look at a map it would become clear to their ignorant eyes that there is no way to funnel aid to Syria except through the Golan Heights! In fact they should be happy that Israel is “occupying’ the area (in fact it was annexed by Israel in the 1980s), otherwise Assad and Iran would be sitting on the Kinneret and threatening Israel’s major population centers.

This cutting off someone else’s nose to spite Israel’s face is a revolting attitude and one which is applied to Israel alone.

Yes, Ms. Patel broke protocol, and then tried to cover it up – always a bad idea. The cover-up is always worse than the offence itself. But the way Parliament, let alone the media, have gone on about these meetings, you would have thought she had met with Nazis at the very least.  We never heard a fraction of such protests when Corbyn met with terrorists at Parliament!

Kudos to her deputy Alastair Burt for stoutly defending her:

As Sussex Friends of Israel pointedly remarked:

WATCH!-A very combative F.O minister Alistair Burt explains during questions on Priti Patels recent trip to Israel why her meetings and who she met with were so important. If your problem is with these meetings and not the fact that Ms Patel didn’t inform the F.O I fear the problem you have is an ‘Israel problem’ and nothing to do with official procedure!!

Sadly it now looks like Priti Patel is facing the sack. What a waste of a career, and all because she tried to help Syrian refugees.  The hypocrisy and double standards scream to the heavens.

This entry was posted in International relations, Lawfare and Delegitimization, Mideast news and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The unpretty story of Priti Patel

  1. Pingback: The unpretty story of Priti Patel – 24/6 Magazine

  2. cba says:

    The latest news is that she’s resigned. Very sad.

    • anneinpt says:

      Thank you. One of the theories going round here is that she was a victim of a “Yes Minister” plot: the PM was keen to promote a more pro-Israel attitude, and Priti Patel is pro-Israel. So she was told to go to Israel and have some secret meetings, especially to arrange aid via the IDF for the Syrians. But she got photographed. Bad move. The Arabist Foreign Office couldn’t abide her independent foreign policy nor her pro-Israel views and worst of all, her keen Brexit support – and…

      I’m not sure if that’s a conspiracy too far but I suppose it’s in the realm of the possible.

  3. Reality says:

    Her 1st mistake was to apologise.She came here on holiday and toured the country in a personal capacity.The problem arose when she unofficially met with politicians.
    As if that never happens here!Our(un) wonderful leftist politicians are always going behind our leaders backs to try and create new peace plans with other countries leaders,who are always over eager to comply.So whats the difference here?As you say ,it wouldn’t have happened had she done this in any other country.

    • anneinpt says:

      She needed to apologize only because she breached ministerial conduct. But that should have been an end to it. They are all making such a hoo-ha of it all because that “demon” Israel is involved. I bet if she met Palestinians in Ramallah no one would have said anything.

  4. Ally says:

    ”there is no way to funnel aid to Syria except through the Golan Heights” is spot on and these virtue-signallers also ignore both historical context and what is actually going on-To whom do they want us to ”return” the Golan? The same Syrian regime which gases its own people and which is in total disarray.That’s like asking the Spurs players to turn up at White Hart Lane next week for their next match and ignoring the bulldozers etc !
    I’d also like to know why ministerial codes matter in a diplomatic context where we all realise (or at least those of us with brains know) that what goes on behind the scenes is of much greater importance. Shimon Peres broke the ministerial code so many times by travelling to Jordan , I’m surprised he wasn’t arrested by the Brits who still seem to think they rule us. Maybe Priti should have used the same hat and moustache that Peres used to take with him!

    • anneinpt says:

      The international hypocrisy about the Golan, as well as Jerusalem and yes, even Judea and Samaria, is outrageous, mind-boggling and in the end utterly stupid and self-defeating. Because Israel is not going anywhere and is not going to abandon any more territory, at least not in a major way like Gaza. Not after the Hamas experience.

      To answer your question about why should ministerial codes matter, there is a lot of theorising that Priti was scapegoated because she was both a Brexiteer and pro-Israel – a double whammy against her. See this tweet for example:

      #BorisJohnson keeps his job despite endangering a British Iranian. #PritiPatel is fired for “unofficial” meetings in Israel. #ScapeGoat

      Or this tweet:

      Would there be this much fuss if she’d visted Ramallah? Or is it just the fact she was in Isreal and the left wing media hates Isreal? Still, the Golan Heights is still better to visit than Blackpool!

Comments are closed.